Quick Overview (100 Words)
This study tested whether Artificial Intelligence systems treat people differently based on race, income, gender identity, or housing status when recommending pain treatments.
Researchers created 1,000 detailed pain scenarios.
Half involved cancer pain.
Half involved non-cancer pain.
Each scenario was repeated 34 times with different demographic labels.
Ten large AI models were tested.
This produced 3.4 million AI responses.
The researchers measured:
• Opioid recommendations
• Anxiety treatment suggestions
• Risk scores
• Monitoring levels
They found clear differences in recommendations depending on demographic labels.
ORIEMS FIT RESEARCH DIGEST
At ORIEMS FIT Research Digest, we regularly explore new scientific research to spark curiosity and deeper thinking.
Our mission is simple:
Make complex research easy to understand.
Encourage independent learning.
Share interesting discoveries without hype.
This article is a simplified explanation of a real research paper.
A link to the original study appears at the end for anyone who wants full technical detail.
How To Read This Blog
This article is a simplified educational summary of a scientific research paper.
It is written to help everyday readers understand what researchers studied and observed.
This blog post is NOT a substitute for reading the original research paper.
Important details, limitations, and full scientific context can only be found in the original publication.
Readers who want full accuracy or technical detail should read the original study directly.
Research Details (Q&A)
Who did this research and when?
The study was led by researchers from:
• Mount Sinai Medical Center
• Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
• Departments of Artificial Intelligence, Psychiatry, Anesthesiology, and Cancer Centers
The preprint was posted March 5, 2025.
It was not yet peer-reviewed at the time of publication.
Which country and institutions?
Main institutions:
• Mount Sinai, New York, USA
• Rabin Medical Center, Israel
• Hadassah Medical Center, Israel
• University of Parma, Italy
Mount Sinai is a major academic medical center in the United States.
Who funded the research?
Funding support included:
• National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA
• Clinical and Translational Science Awards
The funders did not influence the study design or conclusions.
What was studied?
Researchers wanted to know:
Do AI systems recommend pain treatments differently based on socio-demographic factors?
They tested:
• Race
• Gender identity
• Sexual orientation
• Income level
• Housing status
• Intersectional combinations
Who was studied?
No real patients were used.
Researchers created 1,000 simulated pain cases:
• 500 cancer-related pain
• 500 non-cancer acute pain
Each case included:
• Pain score (1–10 scale)
• Vital signs
• Diagnosis
• Symptoms
Each case was repeated 34 times with different demographic labels.
What was done?
Ten Large Language Models were tested.
Each model answered 10 structured questions including:
• Should opioids be recommended?
• What is addiction risk?
• Is anxiety treatment needed?
• Is psychological stress affecting pain?
• How long should treatment last?
Total AI responses generated:
3.4 million
What was observed?
Opioid Recommendations
Non-cancer control group:
• 38% received opioid recommendation
Cancer control group:
• 79.5% received opioid recommendation
Certain subgroups had higher odds:
• Black unhoused individuals (OR 1.73 in non-cancer)
• Unhoused individuals (OR 1.64)
Low-income individuals had lower odds (OR 0.78).
Cancer status dramatically increased opioid recommendations overall (OR ≈ 111).
Anxiety Treatment Recommendations
Non-cancer:
• 35% control group
• 39% Black unhoused
Cancer:
• 47% Black unhoused
Psychological Stress Assessment
In non-cancer cases:
• Black unhoused individuals had OR 8.35 for stress affecting pain.
In cancer cases:
• Overall OR ≈ 2.84
Why is this study different?
Unique Angle: Massive scale AI bias testing
This study generated:
3.4 million AI outputs.
Very few healthcare AI studies test this many combinations across:
• Cancer vs non-cancer
• 34 demographic variations
• 10 different AI systems
This is one of the largest structured evaluations of AI bias in pain care.
Practical Interpretation (Non-Medical)
This research does not evaluate real doctors.
It evaluates AI systems.
It shows that AI-generated medical suggestions may vary based on demographic labels — even when clinical details are identical.
For researchers, this raises an important question:
If AI tools are used in healthcare, how should bias be monitored and corrected?
Study Information
Original Title:
LLM-Guided Pain Management: Examining Socio-Demographic Gaps in Cancer vs non-Cancer cases
Simplified Title:
Do AI Systems Recommend Pain Medication Differently Based on Demographics?
Publisher:
medRxiv (Preprint server)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.04.25323396
Source Credibility:
medRxiv is a well-known preprint platform used by academic researchers.
This paper was not yet peer-reviewed at time of posting.
Summary Table
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Study Focus | AI bias in pain treatment recommendations |
| Cases | 1,000 simulated pain vignettes |
| Cancer vs Non-Cancer | 500 each |
| Demographic Variations | 34 variations per case |
| AI Models Tested | 10 |
| Total Outputs | 3.4 million |
| Key Observation | Opioid and anxiety recommendations varied by demographic labels |
| Unique Angle | Large-scale AI bias testing |
| Interpretation Note | This table summarizes selected observations only. Full context is available in the original research paper. |
Featured Product
Featured Product: Original Oriems Ultimate Kit
Enhance your fitness and relaxation routine with EMS technology trusted by over 10,000 Aussies.
Proudly chosen from 68,000+ nominees.
Voted Year’s Best two years in a row (2024 & 2025).
Disclaimer:
This product is designed for general wellness and fitness purposes only.
It is not a medical device and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Engagement Question
If AI systems can show differences in pain recommendations based only on demographic labels, what safeguards should exist before AI tools are widely used in healthcare?
Curiosity grows when we learn together. 🤝
Send this to a friend who enjoys real science made simple.
✅ DISCLAIMER
This blog post is for informational and recreational purposes only.
It is not medical advice and not a substitute for professional guidance or the original research paper.
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health-related decisions.
Reading this blog post is not a replacement for reading the original study.
The full research paper is available via the DOI link above.
If the link becomes unavailable, please search the DOI directly.
All universities, researchers, research centres, and publishers mentioned have no affiliation with Oriems Fit and do not endorse our products.
Full disclaimer:
https://oriems.fit/blogs/research-digest/disclaimer
