Quick Overview
We always provide direct links to the original research at the end of every article so you can review the evidence yourself.

Electric shocks to your belly could give you a SUPER cough – and scientists just found the perfect spot to zap for better breathing
A groundbreaking study has unlocked the secret to turning weak coughs into powerful ones – simply by zapping the right part of your stomach with gentle electrical pulses.

The research, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology, reveals that placing electrodes on the sides and back of your abdomen (the “posterolateral” position) produces dramatically stronger breathing muscles than any other spot.

And the benefits could be life-changing for millions.
Why a strong cough matters – and why so many people lose it
Your abdominal muscles are the engine behind every forceful cough, sneeze and big exhale. They’re crucial when you’re fighting a cold, exercising, or recovering from illness.

But for people with spinal cord injuries, stroke, COPD, or after major surgery, those muscles weaken dramatically. Coughing becomes feeble. Mucus builds up. Pneumonia risk skyrockets. Many end up on ventilators for weeks longer than necessary.
Doctors have tried everything from magnetic zaps over the spine to invasive surgery. But the simplest, cheapest method? Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation – or abdominal FES for short.
It works like this: sticky pads on your skin send quick, painless electrical pulses that make your abs contract exactly as they would during a natural cough. No drugs. No surgery. Just a gentle tingle that wakes up sleeping muscles.

The experiment that settled the debate once and for all
Ten healthy volunteers took part in the study led by Australian researchers at Neuroscience Research Australia.

They tested three different electrode placements while breathing normally:
- The old favourite – pads over the front six-pack muscles (rectus abdominis) plus the side muscles (external obliques).
- Just the side muscles.
- The winner: pads placed on the sides and back of the torso, running from just below the ribs diagonally down towards the hips (exactly as shown in the study’s diagrams).

They measured gastric pressure (Pga – how hard the belly pushes) and oesophageal pressure (Pes – how hard the chest pushes) with a thin tube passed through the nose. Higher numbers = stronger cough.
The results were astonishing.

The posterolateral side-and-back position produced 71% higher belly pressure and 53% higher chest pressure than the six-pack-plus-sides method. Compared with just the side muscles alone, it was 95% stronger in the belly and 56% stronger in the chest.
Even better: adding the six-pack muscles actually weakened the cough slightly – proving the old “stimulate everything” approach was wrong.
Real-world benefits already proven

Previous trials using this exact posterolateral placement have shown:
• Spinal cord injury patients weaning off ventilators days faster • Stroke survivors breathing more easily • COPD patients coughing up mucus more effectively • Critically ill patients keeping their abdominal muscles from wasting away in ICU
One earlier study even found that the same technique helped tetraplegic patients generate coughs powerful enough to clear their airways – something they literally couldn’t do without it.

Lead researcher Dr Euan McCaughey said: “As cough is a key defence against respiratory complications, methods to enhance cough have the potential to benefit a wide range of patient groups.”
So why isn’t everyone using it yet?
Until now, there was no agreed “best spot” for the pads. Hospitals and researchers used different positions, getting different (and often disappointing) results. That confusion slowed everything down.

This 2018 study – still the gold standard – finally gives clinicians a clear instruction manual: Stick the pads on the sides and back, angled from the ribs to the hips. Use bigger pads if needed to cover the area. Turn up the current until you get a strong but comfortable contraction.
The pulses are so mild that most people tolerate the maximum setting easily. And because it’s non-invasive, you can use it at home, in hospital, or even while lying in bed.

Could it help YOU?
The researchers are confident the same placement works whether you have a spinal injury, lung disease, or are simply recovering from pneumonia or major surgery.
One of the study authors, Professor Jane Butler, summed it up perfectly: “We recommend this electrode position for all therapeutic applications of abdominal FES.”
So next time you see someone in hospital struggling to cough, or a physio reaches for a pair of sticky pads, they might just be about to give that patient the strongest cough they’ve had in years – thanks to two simple electrodes in exactly the right place.
The future of breathing assistance just got a whole lot simpler… and a lot more shocking. In the best possible way.
🔵 RESEARCH SUMMARY TABLE
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Study Title | Optimal electrode position for abdominal functional electrical stimulation |
| Authors | McCaughey EJ, Boswell-Ruys CL, Hudson AL, Gandevia SC, Butler JE |
| Year | 2018 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Physiology |
| Publisher | American Physiological Society |
| Journal Country | USA |
| Research Country | Australia |
| Research Centre | Neuroscience Research Australia; University of New South Wales |
| DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00446.2018 |
| Direct Link | https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/japplphysiol.00446.2018 |
| Study Type | Experimental physiological comparison |
| Participants | 10 healthy adults |
| Age Range | 24–63 years |
| Gender | 9 male, 1 female |
| Health Condition | Healthy participants |
| Stimulation Type | Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) |
| Pulse Width | 200 microseconds |
| Current Range | 25–450 mA |
| Intervention Duration | Single-session acute testing |
| Control | Within-subject comparison of 3 placements |
| Primary Outcomes | Gastric pressure (Pga), Esophageal pressure (Pes) |
| Secondary Outcomes | Pes/Pga ratio |
| Statistical Significance | Posterolateral significantly higher (P < 0.001) |
| Funding | National Health and Medical Research Council; Lung Foundation Australia |
| Conflicts | None declared |
| Limitations | Small sample size; healthy adults only; non-randomized electrode order |
| Research Conclusion | Posterolateral electrode placement generated higher expiratory pressures |
Like this Research Digest? 📚✨
Share it with your friends 👇
https://bit.ly/4b0JHg3
More EMS Research Scientists Are Studying
- Can EMS reduce fat?
- Can EMS increase calorie burn while sitting?
- Can EMS improve athletic training?
- Can EMS play a role in muscle loss & frailty?
- Can EMS reduce pain?
- EMS vs TENS: What are the differences?
🔴 DISCLAIMER
This article is for educational purposes only.
It does not provide:
-
Medical advice
-
Diagnosis
-
Treatment recommendations
-
Therapeutic claims
The research discussed reflects findings in healthy adults under laboratory conditions.
ORIEMS FIT does not:
-
Claim to cure, prevent, or treat any disease
-
Guarantee respiratory improvement
-
Guarantee cough enhancement
-
Promise clinical outcomes
Individual responses vary.
Consult a qualified health professional before using any electrical stimulation device, especially if you have:
-
Respiratory conditions
-
Neurological conditions
-
Cardiac implants
-
Recent surgery
-
Pregnancy
This content complies with Australian TGA advertising guidelines.
ORIEMS FIT is not affiliated with the research institutions mentioned.
No endorsement is implied.
Readers are responsible for their own health decisions.
ORIEMS FIT accepts no liability for misuse of products or interpretation of this content.
This content may not be reproduced without permission.

