Item has been added

Skip to content

Same Day Dispatch via Australia Post

Get in touch with us

What Happens When Footballers Add EMS to Jump and Strength Work?

Quick Overview

A 2022 PeerJ trial tested EMS in 60 collegiate male football players.

Both groups trained three days a week for eight weeks with plyometric drills and quadriceps strength work. One group used real NMES. The other used sham pads.

Scientists measured thigh force, a 50-metre sprint, and a single-leg triple hop. Real EMS lifted strength from 145 to 215 and cut sprint time from 9.19s to 7.91s. The sham group gained less. Majmaah University led the work with UK partners.

These figures suggest EMS can help sports training for strength and speed.

Read the full post for every score, the plan, and other sports.




We always provide direct links to the original research at the end of every article so you can review the evidence yourself.




EMS Training Helped University Footballers Get Stronger and Faster in Eight Weeks

A new study looked at a simple training add-on.
Researchers tested EMS, also called NMES, on young football players.
They wanted to know if it could lift strength, sprint speed, and jumping power.

This was not a guess.
It was a real trial with real athletes.
The work was led by scientists at Majmaah University in Saudi Arabia.
Partners came from Teesside University in the United Kingdom and King Saud University.
The paper was published in PeerJ, a peer-reviewed science journal.
That means other experts checked the methods before it went public.

Sixty healthy collegiate male football players took part.
They were aged about 18 to 25.
All of them already trained.
None had a current lower-limb injury that stopped play.

The men were split into two groups of 30.
Both groups did the same plyometric work.
That included bounding, hurdling, and drop jumps.
Both groups also did strength training for the quadriceps.
They trained three days a week for eight weeks.

One group used real EMS during the strength work.
Pads sat over the thigh muscles and the femoral nerve area.
The machine made the muscle contract while the player pushed.
Each EMS session lasted 25 minutes.
The other group used a sham setup.
The pads were placed off the main nerve path.
The feeling was mild.
That let the team compare real EMS with almost none.

They measured three things before and after.
First was quadriceps strength on a dynamometer.
Second was a 50-metre sprint.
Third was a single-leg triple hop.

Both groups improved.
That already shows hard training works.
The EMS group improved more on strength and sprint time.

Look at the strength numbers.
The EMS group started near 145 units of torque.
After eight weeks they reached about 215.
That is a rise of about 69.
The sham group rose from about 145 to 166.
That is a rise of about 21.
The gap between groups was large.
The effect size for strength was 10.84.

Now the sprint.
The EMS group went from 9.19 seconds to 7.91 seconds.
The sham group went from 9.23 seconds to 8.61 seconds.
The extra gain with EMS was clear.
The effect size for sprint was 1.31.

The hop test also moved up in both groups.
The EMS group gained more metres on average.
The between-group gap was smaller and not statistically strong.
So the brightest signals were muscle strength and sprint speed.

Why might that happen?
EMS can drive extra muscle fibres to fire.
It can add force on top of a voluntary squeeze.
Paired with jumps and strength work, that extra drive may add up.

The study was built for one group.
Young male university football players.
The authors say the same idea may help other field sports.
Think rugby, netball, volleyball, and other sports that need speed and power.
Other young athletes who already train may see a similar extra lift.
The paper does not prove that for every sport or every age.
It does give a clear signal in this football group.

This is training research, not a medical treatment claim.
The players were healthy.
EMS sat on top of normal strength and plyometric work.
It was not used instead of training.
Anyone who tries a device should follow the maker’s guide and get coach or clinician advice.

The bright side is simple.
Eight weeks of smart work helped both groups.
Adding real EMS to that work gave a bigger jump in quadriceps strength.
It also shaved more time off the 50-metre sprint.
For footballers who already train, that extra edge is the point of the study.

The scientists were careful.
They used a sham group.
They kept the tester blind to who got real EMS.
They published the full methods.
That is why this blog can lean on the paper with confidence.

EMS is not magic.
Training still does the heavy lifting.
In this trial, pairing EMS with that training looked better for strength and speed than training with a dummy signal.

That is the story the numbers tell.
Young footballers got stronger.
They got faster over 50 metres.
The group that used real EMS moved further on those two tests.
Other power sports may want to watch this space.

Featured Product




 

ORIEMS FIT ULTIMATE KIT 💪 is a 100% Australian award-winning product.

Voted YEAR’S BEST ⭐ for 2024 and 2025.

It is a wide-range targeted muscle stimulator enhanced with EMS technology, designed to support your fitness and relaxation routine. 🌟

Trusted by more than 10,000 happy users with over 450 five-star Google reviews. 😊

Check availability.

Product Disclaimer:

This product is designed only to support fitness and relaxation routines. It is not a medical device and has not been evaluated or registered by the TGA. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease or medical condition. It may not be suitable for everyone. Please consult your doctor or healthcare practitioner before using it.



 

Like this Research Digest? 📚

Share it with your friends 💬👇




About Our Health Research Digest

We bring you the latest and most important health research papers — simplified and easy to understand.

Each study is broken down into clear, concise summaries and engaging podcasts, with direct links to the original research so you can explore further whenever you like.

We also create content based on your requests. If you’re curious about a specific health topic or would like us to find relevant studies, simplify the findings, and turn them into a podcast, just let us know.

Don’t hesitate to reach out — we’re here to help make health research accessible and useful for you. Contact us anytime.


More  EMS   Research Scientists Are Studying

1. Can  EMS   reduce fat? 

2. Can   EMS  increase calorie burn while sitting?

3. Can   EMS  support muscle toning and muscle gains?

4. Can   EMS   improve athletic  training?

5. Can   EMS   play a role in muscle loss & frailty?

6. Can   EMS  reduce pain? 

7.   EMS   vs TENS: What are the differences?

8. Can  EMS  play a role after stroke?


Research Summary

Detail What the study reported
Study title Effect of plyometric training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation assisted strength training on muscular, sprint, and functional performances in collegiate male football players
Journal and date PeerJ, published 16 June 2022, volume 10, article e13588
Original study link https://peerj.com/articles/13588/
DOI https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13588
Research team Led by Shahnaz Hasan at Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia, with partners from Teesside University, UK, and King Saud University
Study design Single-blind, two-arm randomised controlled trial
Who took part 60 healthy collegiate male football players, 30 in each group, aged about 18 to 25
Where it ran Rehabilitation centre, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia, from late 2020 to mid 2021
Training period 8 weeks, 3 sessions a week
Shared training Both groups did the same plyometric work (bounding, hurdling, drop jumps) plus quadriceps strength work
EMS contrast The test group used real NMES during strength work for 25 minutes. The control group used sham pads and a mild signal
What scientists measured Quadriceps strength on a dynamometer, a 50-metre sprint, and a single-leg triple hop
Strength change EMS group rose from 145.20 to 214.67. Sham group rose from 144.93 to 165.90
Sprint change EMS group fell from 9.19 s to 7.91 s. Sham group fell from 9.23 s to 8.61 s
Hop change EMS group rose from 501.30 to 540.73. Sham group rose from 499.90 to 509.37
Between-group gap After 8 weeks, strength differed by about 48.77 (p = 0.001, d = 10.84). Sprint differed by 0.70 s (p = 0.002, d = 1.31). The hop gap was not statistically significant (p = 0.221, d = 0.613)
Main finding Both programmes improved performance. Real EMS plus training had an extra edge for strength and sprint in these footballers
Limits named by the authors Short 8-week window, male university football players only, and outside training was not tightly tracked, so results should not be stretched to every sport or every age group
Ethics and funding Approved by Majmaah University research ethics (MUREC-Dec. 15/COM-2020/13-2). Funded by Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Education project IFP-2020-25. Authors reported no competing interests
Platform Listen Now
Apple Podcasts Apple Podcasts
Listen on Apple
Spotify Spotify
Listen on Spotify
YouTube YouTube
Watch on YouTube
Audible Amazon Audible
Listen on Audible
Podbean Podbean
Listen on Podbean

Disclaimer

This article is published for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, health advice, diagnosis, or treatment of any kind.

All content on this website, including any studies, research, or information mentioned, is provided for informational purposes only and does not imply or guarantee any specific health outcomes.

We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected in any way to any researchers, universities, research centres, journals, or institutions referenced in any article. No reference to any study, researcher, or publication should be interpreted as an endorsement or recommendation of any products sold or featured on this website.

Our products (and any products featured or linked in this article) are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, prevent, or manage any disease or medical condition. Individual results may vary significantly. No guarantees or warranties are made regarding effectiveness, safety, or specific outcomes.

Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before using any product mentioned on this website or making any changes to your health routine, especially if you have a pre-existing medical condition, are pregnant, breastfeeding, have a pacemaker, or are taking medication.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, ORIEMS FIT, its directors, employees, authors, affiliates, and agents disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, cost, expense, or injury (whether direct, indirect, consequential, special, or incidental) arising from the use of, or reliance upon, any information in this article or from the purchase or use of any products featured or sold on this website.

© [ORIEMS FIT] – All Rights Reserved.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published