Item has been added

Skip to content

Same Day Dispatch via Australia Post

Get in touch with us

What Did Scientists Measure When Athletes Added EMS?

What Did Scientists Measure When Athletes Added EMS?

Quick Overview

Scientists in France and the United States put EMS to the test. They did not guess. They measured muscle strength, jump height, kick speed, muscle size, nerve drive, and blood lactate.

Young gymnasts gained knee strength of about 35% to 51% in three weeks. Soccer players kicked faster after five weeks. One lab found strength up 27% in eight weeks, with more muscle mass. Pitchers cleared lactate better with EMS than with jogging. Swimmers cleared more lactate with EMS than with sitting still.

The papers ran in top sport journals from known universities. That is why the work is worth trusting.

The measured wins were for athletes who wanted extra strength, jump, kick power, or faster recovery. The same idea may help other people who train hard, and for more than one goal.

Read the full post for the numbers, the labs, and the full story.


We always provide direct links to the original research at the end of every article so you can review the evidence yourself.


 

Scientists Measured Real Gains When Athletes Added EMS to Training

Picture a gymnast after a hard session.
Her legs feel cooked.
The next jump still has to be sharp.

Now picture a soccer player who needs more power in the kick.
And a pitcher who must throw again after a short rest.

Researchers in France and the United States asked a simple question.
Could electrical muscle stimulation, or EMS, add something extra to normal training?

They did not guess.
They measured strength, jump height, ball speed, muscle size, and blood lactate.
The papers sat in respected journals.
The work came from universities with long records in sport science.

This is that story, in plain language.

 

 

Where the research came from

One review was published in 2011 in the European Journal of Applied Physiology.
That journal is issued by Springer.
The authors worked at the University of the Mediterranean in Marseille, France.
Their lab sat inside a CNRS magnetic resonance centre.

Other trials appeared in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.
That journal is linked to the National Strength and Conditioning Association in the United States.

A key muscle study ran in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
That is the flagship journal of the American College of Sports Medicine.

Teams in Dijon, France, worked at the University of Burgundy.
They used an INSERM movement laboratory and a performance centre.
Teams in California worked at California State University, Fullerton.
Another group worked at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

France and the United States have deep histories in physiology and sport science.
These were not blog claims.
They were peer-reviewed papers with control groups and numbers.


What EMS actually does

 


 

EMS sends small electrical pulses through pads on the skin.
The pulses make a muscle contract.
You sit or lie still.
The device does the firing.

Scientists noted something useful for training.
EMS can wake fast-twitch fibres at lower force levels.
In a normal lift, those fibres often wait until the effort is already hard.

The 2011 French review said EMS training led to a clear rise in muscle strength.
When people mixed EMS with normal dynamic work, sport skills also moved.
Jumping and sprint work were among the gains listed.

The authors called EMS a useful extra when time is short.
They also called it a legal add-on to voluntary strength training.
They did not say it should replace the gym.

 

 

Young gymnasts: strength and jump in six weeks

 

A 2011 trial from the University of Burgundy tested 16 young female gymnasts.
Average age was about 12 years.
Eight added EMS on the knee extensors.
Eight kept gymnastic training only.

 

EMS ran for 20 minutes.
It ran three times a week for the first three weeks.
Then it ran once a week for three more weeks.

After the first three weeks, knee strength jumped.
Maximal torque rose about 40%, 35%, and 51% at three different speeds.
Squat jump rose about 21%.
A reactivity test rose about 20%.
Some gymnastic-specific jumps rose about 15%.

The control group did not show those same changes.
After six weeks, counter-movement jump was up about 10%.
The jump gains were still there one month after EMS stopped.

The authors suggested a short block of EMS could sit inside a young gymnast’s plan.
The aim was extra strength and jumping ability, on top of normal work.

Soccer players: stronger quads and a faster kick

A 2010 trial from the same French group tested 20 male amateur soccer players.
Ten added EMS on the quadriceps.
Ten kept soccer training only.

The EMS block lasted five weeks.
Players did three sessions of 12 minutes each week.

After three weeks, isometric and eccentric knee strength had risen.
Ball speed without a run-up had also risen.



After five weeks, eccentric, isometric, and concentric torque were all higher.
Ball speed was higher again.

The control group did not show those same lifts.
The authors said EMS looked like a useful complement for soccer.
They also said it added variety, which some players enjoy.


What changed inside the muscle

 


 

A 2005 study in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise went deeper.
Twenty men took part.
Twelve did eight weeks of isometric EMS on the quads.
Eight did no EMS.

 


 

There were 32 sessions in total.
After eight weeks, maximal voluntary strength was up 27%.
The control group did not gain that strength.

Neural drive rose.
Muscle activation rose about 6%.
Electrical activity in vastus lateralis rose about 69%.
Activity in vastus medialis rose about 39%.

The muscle itself changed too.
Quadriceps cross-sectional area rose about 6%.
Pennation angle in vastus lateralis rose about 14%.
That is a sign of a more efficient fibre layout.

Neural changes showed up mainly in the first four weeks.
Muscle size changes showed up between weeks four and eight.
The authors said the strength gains came from both nerve and muscle.

That is a bright detail.
EMS did not only make people feel tighter.
Researchers measured more tissue and a better firing pattern.




 

Recovery between hard efforts

EMS was also tested as a rest tool, not only a strength tool.

In 2011, researchers in Nevada studied seven NCAA Division II baseball pitchers.
After an inning, each man used one of three six-minute rests.
Sit still.
Jog.
Or EMS on the arm and shoulder.


 

EMS produced the biggest drop in blood lactate.
Passive rest and jogging did not show a significant lactate drop.
Pitch speed after EMS was higher than after jogging.
Pitchers also said they felt more recovered after EMS.


The authors favoured EMS for that short rest window.
The reason was better lactate clearance and better self-reported recovery.

A 2009 California State University Fullerton study looked at swimmers.
Athletes did a 200-yard sprint.
Then they recovered for 20 minutes in one of three ways.
Easy swimming.
EMS.
Or sitting still.



 

Easy swimming cleared lactate the fastest.
That is no surprise.
But EMS still beat sitting still.
At 20 minutes, mean lactate was about 3.12 mmol/L with EMS.
It was about 4.11 mmol/L with passive rest.

The authors said EMS could be a backup when a pool is not handy.
It could also help when an athlete is too drained to keep moving.

 

 

Who these findings speak to

The measured groups were clear.
Healthy adults.
Recreational and competitive athletes.
Young gymnasts.
Soccer players.
College pitchers.
Sprint swimmers.

The same pattern kept appearing.
Add EMS to normal training, and extra strength or skill numbers showed up.
Use EMS in a short rest, and lactate often fell faster than doing nothing.

Other people who train for power, jump, kick, or repeat efforts may find the same logic useful.
The papers did not test every sport.
They did show the same direction across several sports.

The bright side, without the hype

 


 

These studies did not sell a miracle.
They sold a complement.

EMS gave extra strength when time was tight.
It gave variety inside a plan.
It reached fast-twitch fibres in a different way.
It helped recovery when full active work was not practical.

In the gymnast trial, more weeks of combined work brought more jump qualities online.
In the soccer trial, three weeks already moved force and ball speed.
Five weeks moved more.
In the eight-week lab study, nerves adapted first.
Then the muscle grew.

That is the useful picture.
EMS was not a replacement for practice.
It was an extra stimulus on top of practice.



When researchers added that extra stimulus, the numbers moved.

How to read this as a reader

 


 

This post follows published trials.
The journals are standard in sport science.
The labs sit inside known universities.
The tests were strength, jump, kick speed, muscle size, nerve drive, and lactate.

It is not medical advice.
It is not a claim that EMS treats injury or illness.
It is a report of training and recovery data in healthy and athletic groups.

If you already train, the research suggests EMS can sit beside that work.
The measured gains came from combining the two, not from dropping the gym.

That is the simple takeaway.
Scientists measured it.
The journals printed it.
The bright side is extra performance work, done in a different way, on top of what you already do.

 

 

Featured Product




 

ORIEMS FIT ULTIMATE KIT 💪 is a 100% Australian award-winning product.

Voted YEAR’S BEST ⭐ for 2024 and 2025.

It is a wide-range targeted muscle stimulator enhanced with EMS technology, designed to support your fitness and relaxation routine. 🌟

Trusted by more than 10,000 happy users with over 450 five-star Google reviews. 😊

Check availability.

Product Disclaimer:

This product is designed only to support fitness and relaxation routines. It is not a medical device and has not been evaluated or registered by the TGA. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease or medical condition. It may not be suitable for everyone. Please consult your doctor or healthcare practitioner before using it.



 

Like this Research Digest? 📚

Share it with your friends 💬👇 https://bit.ly/3TqFRYA




About Our Health Research Digest

We bring you the latest and most important health research papers — simplified and easy to understand.

Each study is broken down into clear, concise summaries and engaging podcasts, with direct links to the original research so you can explore further whenever you like.

We also create content based on your requests. If you’re curious about a specific health topic or would like us to find relevant studies, simplify the findings, and turn them into a podcast, just let us know.

Don’t hesitate to reach out — we’re here to help make health research accessible and useful for you. Contact us anytime.


More  EMS   Research Scientists Are Studying

1. Can  EMS   reduce fat? 

2. Can   EMS  increase calorie burn while sitting?

3. Can   EMS  support muscle toning and muscle gains?

4. Can   EMS   improve athletic  training?

5. Can   EMS   play a role in muscle loss & frailty?

6. Can   EMS  reduce pain? 

7.   EMS   vs TENS: What are the differences?

8. Can  EMS  play a role after stroke?


Research Summary



Detail What the research showed
What this pack is A set of peer-reviewed EMS papers on strength, sport skill, muscle change, and recovery, not one lone claim.
Main journals European Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
Why the source looks legit Papers came from University of Burgundy (Dijon), University of the Mediterranean (Marseille), Cal State Fullerton, and University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
How scientists measured They used control groups plus tests of torque, jump, ball speed, muscle size, nerve drive, and blood lactate.
Healthy people and athletes review Gondin et al. (2011) said high-frequency EMS raised isometric strength and can complement voluntary training. Original study
Fast-twitch fibre point The same review said EMS can recruit fast-twitch fibres at lower force than many voluntary lifts.
Young gymnasts Deley et al. (2011) tested 16 girls aged about 12.4 years. Eight added knee-extensor EMS to gym work. Original study
Gymnast strength numbers After 3 weeks, knee torque rose about 40%, 35%, and 51% at three test speeds. Controls did not match that.
Gymnast jump numbers Squat jump rose about 21%. A reactivity test rose about 20%. Some sport jumps rose about 15%.
Jump stay-power Counter-movement jump rose about 10% by week 6. Jump gains were still there 1 month after EMS stopped.
Soccer players Billot et al. (2010) tested 20 amateur men. Ten added 5 weeks of quadriceps EMS (3 x 12 min a week). Original study
Soccer results By week 3, isometric and eccentric knee force and standing ball speed rose. By week 5, concentric torque and ball speed also rose.
Nerve and muscle study Gondin et al. (2005) gave 12 men 8 weeks of quad EMS (32 sessions) and compared them with 8 controls. Original study
Lab strength and size Max voluntary strength rose 27%. Quad cross-section rose about 6%. Vastus lateralis pennation angle rose about 14%.
Nerve-drive numbers Muscle activation rose about 6%. Vastus lateralis EMG rose about 69%. Vastus medialis EMG rose about 39%.
Baseball recovery Warren et al. (2011) compared 6 minutes of rest, jogging, or arm-and-shoulder EMS in 7 college pitchers. Original study
Pitcher result Only EMS cut blood lactate in a clear way. Later pitch speed was higher after EMS than after jogging.
Swim recovery Neric et al. (2009) compared easy swimming, EMS, and sitting still after a 200-yard sprint. Original study
Swim lactate numbers At 20 minutes, mean lactate was about 3.12 mmol/L with EMS and about 4.11 mmol/L with passive rest. Easy swimming was still best.
Who it may also help Measured groups were gymnasts, soccer players, pitchers, swimmers, and healthy adults. The same extra-stimulus idea may also help other people who train for power, jump, or short rest between hard efforts.

 

Platform Listen Now
Apple Podcasts Apple Podcasts
Listen on Apple
Spotify Spotify
Listen on Spotify
YouTube YouTube
Watch on YouTube
Audible Amazon Audible
Listen on Audible
Podbean Podbean
Listen on Podbean

Disclaimer

This article is published for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, health advice, diagnosis, or treatment of any kind.

All content on this website, including any studies, research, or information mentioned, is provided for informational purposes only and does not imply or guarantee any specific health outcomes.

We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected in any way to any researchers, universities, research centres, journals, or institutions referenced in any article. No reference to any study, researcher, or publication should be interpreted as an endorsement or recommendation of any products sold or featured on this website.

Our products (and any products featured or linked in this article) are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, prevent, or manage any disease or medical condition. Individual results may vary significantly. No guarantees or warranties are made regarding effectiveness, safety, or specific outcomes.

Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before using any product mentioned on this website or making any changes to your health routine, especially if you have a pre-existing medical condition, are pregnant, breastfeeding, have a pacemaker, or are taking medication.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, ORIEMS FIT, its directors, employees, authors, affiliates, and agents disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, cost, expense, or injury (whether direct, indirect, consequential, special, or incidental) arising from the use of, or reliance upon, any information in this article or from the purchase or use of any products featured or sold on this website.

© [ORIEMS FIT] – All Rights Reserved.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published