Welcome to another post from the ORIEMS FIT RESEARCH DIGEST.

In this series, we share interesting scientific studies about electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) in simple language.
Our goal is to spark curiosity, not to give medical advice.

Every post includes a direct link to the original research paper at the end, so readers can: 

• collect studies,

• check facts,

• or explore the full scientific details themselves.

HOW TO READ THIS BLOG

This article is a simplified educational summary of a scientific research paper.

It is written to help everyday readers understand what researchers studied and observed.
This blog post is not a substitute for reading the original research paper.

Important details, limitations, and full scientific context can only be found in the original publication.
Readers who want full accuracy should read the original study directly.

RESEARCH DETAILS (Q&A STYLE)

Who did this research and when?

This study was published in 2020.

It was conducted by researchers from:

• Akita Rehabilitation College

• Akita University Graduate School of Medicine

Both institutions are based in Akita, Japan.

Are these research institutions trustworthy?

Yes.
Akita University is a national public university in Japan, known for medical and rehabilitation research.
The study was published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, meaning other scientists reviewed it before publication.

Who funded the research?

The study reported no external funding, reducing commercial influence.

What was this research about?

The researchers wanted to know:

Can belt-electrode skeletal muscle electrical stimulation reduce psychological stress — similar to rhythmic exercise like walking?

Instead of asking people how stressed they felt, they measured stress using saliva.

Who was studied?

• 30 healthy adult men

• Average age: about 21 years

• No medical conditions

• No medications

What did the researchers do?

Participants were randomly placed into three groups:

1. METABO B-SES group

   • Low-frequency EMS (4 Hz)

   • Rhythmic, gentle muscle contractions

2. DISUSE B-SES group

   • Higher-frequency EMS (20 Hz)

   • Different contraction pattern

3. Control group

   • Rested quietly with no EMS

Each session lasted 20 minutes.

How was stress measured?

Stress was measured using salivary alpha-amylase.

This enzyme:

• rises during stress,

• falls during relaxation,

• and is widely used in stress research because it is non-invasive and fast.

Saliva was collected:

• before stimulation,

• immediately after,

• and 30 minutes later.

What did the researchers observe?

Only the METABO B-SES group showed a statistically significant change in stress markers.

Specifically:

• Salivary amylase levels changed significantly over time

• Levels were lower 30 minutes after EMS

• The change reached statistical significance (p = 0.023)

No significant stress changes were seen in:

• the higher-frequency EMS group

• or the control group

No adverse events were reported.

WHY THIS STUDY IS DIFFERENT

Unique angle:
This study did not rely on questionnaires.

Instead, it used a biological stress marker from saliva, making stress measurable, objective, and fast.

It also tested rhythmic EMS, designed to imitate the steady tempo of walking — without voluntary exercise.

PRACTICAL INTERPRETATION (NON-MEDICAL)

This study helps researchers understand that:

• gentle, rhythmic muscle stimulation

• may interact with the nervous system

• in ways similar to rhythmic movement

It does not prove treatment effects, but it adds evidence that how EMS is delivered matters.

STUDY INFORMATION

Original research paper title:
Effect of belt electrode skeletal muscle electrical stimulation on psychological stress

Simplified title:
Can rhythmic electrical muscle stimulation influence stress markers?

Journal:
Personalized Medicine Universe (2020)

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46459/pmu.2019020

Why this source is trustworthy:

• Peer-reviewed journal

• Conducted by Japanese medical universities

• Objective biological measurements

• Clear methodology and statistics

SUMMARY TABLE

FEATURED PRODUCT

Featured Product: Original Oriems Ultimate Kit

Enhance your fitness and relaxation routine with EMS technology trusted by over 10,000 Aussies.
Proudly chosen from 68,000+ nominees.
Voted Year’s Best two years in a row (2024 & 2025).

Disclaimer:
This product is designed for general wellness and fitness purposes only.
It is not a medical device and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Do you think rhythm plays a bigger role in how our bodies respond to movement and stimulation?
Leave a comment and share your thoughts.

Like this research digest? 🧠⚡
Share it with your friends who love science, wellness, and cool discoveries!
👉 https://bit.ly/45Xv8rK

MANDATORY DISCLAIMER

This blog post is for informational and recreational purposes only.

It is not medical advice and not a substitute for professional guidance or the original research paper.

Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health-related decisions.

Full disclaimer:
https://oriems.fit/blogs/research-digest/disclaimer