Item has been added

Skip to content

AfterPay And ZipPay Available

Get in touch with us

Can 1 Minute of Electrical Stimulation Replace 5 Minutes of Stretching? | A 2025 Japanese Study, Published in Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology

Can 1 Minute of Electrical Stimulation Replace 5 Minutes of Stretching? | A 2025 Japanese Study, Published in Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology

What if your warm-up is longer than it needs to be?
And what if science just proved there’s a faster way?

A brand-new 2025 clinical trial from Japan has shaken up traditional stretching advice.

Researchers tested whether neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with elastic taping could improve ankle flexibility as effectively as static stretching.

The result?
One minute of NMES plus taping worked just as well as five minutes of static stretching.

And it did it safely.


First — What Is NMES?

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) is a method that sends small electrical pulses into muscles.

These pulses cause controlled muscle contractions.

NMES is commonly used for:

  • Muscle activation

  • Rehabilitation

  • Strength support

  • Circulation improvement

  • Flexibility support

Unlike passive stretching, NMES actively contracts the muscle.

That contraction may help:

  • Improve tissue glide

  • Reduce stiffness

  • Enhance joint range of motion

  • Support warm-up efficiency


What Did This Study Actually Test?

Researchers from the International University of Health and Welfare (Japan) conducted a randomized crossover clinical trial on 83 healthy university students.

They compared:

1️⃣ Combined Intervention (CI)
• 1 minute of NMES applied to calf muscles
• Elastic tape applied to the sole of the foot

versus

2️⃣ Static Stretching (SS)
• 5 minutes of traditional calf stretching

They measured:

  • Ankle dorsiflexion angle (primary outcome)

  • Finger-floor distance

  • Straight leg raise

  • Plantar flexor strength

  • Knee flexor strength


The Results

Both methods improved ankle flexibility.

But here’s the key finding:

The 1-minute NMES + taping intervention was statistically equivalent to 5 minutes of static stretching.

Even better?

There was no loss of muscle strength in either group.

That matters.

Because prolonged static stretching before activity has been shown in other research to temporarily reduce muscle strength.

This shorter NMES-based method may provide flexibility support without that drawback.


Why This Matters

Time efficiency matters in:

  • Sports warm-ups

  • Rehabilitation clinics

  • Busy schedules

  • Pre-competition routines

If flexibility gains can be achieved in 1 minute instead of 5, that changes practical application.

For EMS users, this reinforces something important:

EMS isn’t just for muscle strength.

It may support:

  • Mobility

  • Flexibility

  • Muscle activation

  • Warm-up preparation


Full Research Summary Table

Category Details
Full Study Title Combined Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Elastic Taping Improves Ankle Range of Motion Equivalent to Static Stretching in Untrained Subjects
Authors Riyaka Ito, Tatsuya Igawa, Ryunosuke Urata, Shomaru Ito, Kosuke Suzuki, Hiroto Takahashi, Mika Toda, Mio Fujita, Akira Kubo
Research Institutions International University of Health and Welfare (Tochigi, Japan); International University of Health and Welfare Hospital; New Spine Clinic Tokyo; Yamagata Saisei Hospital
Country Japan
Published In Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology (MDPI)
Publication Date 6 February 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10010058
Study Design Randomized crossover trial with equivalence testing
Participants 83 healthy university students
Intervention 1 minute NMES (80 Hz, 250 µs pulse width, 20–50 mA) + elastic tape on plantar foot
Comparison 5 minutes static stretching
Primary Outcome Ankle dorsiflexion angle
Secondary Outcomes Finger-floor distance, straight leg raise, plantar & knee flexor strength
Main Finding 1-minute NMES + taping was equivalent to 5-minute static stretching
Strength Impact No significant reduction in muscle strength
Funding No external funding declared
Conflict of Interest None declared
Registry UMIN000054631

Original Study Link

https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10010058 

Like this Research Digest? 📚✨
Share it with your friends and spread the science! 🧠⚡Discover more here 👇
https://bit.ly/3OePsPs


Disclaimer 

This article is part of the ORIEMS FIT Research Digest series. It summarizes peer-reviewed research for educational purposes only.

ORIEMS FIT does not claim to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
The information presented is not medical advice and should not replace professional healthcare consultation.

Results discussed in the study were observed in healthy university students under controlled research conditions. Individual outcomes may vary.

ORIEMS FIT is not affiliated with or endorsed by the study authors, institutions, or publisher.

Always consult a qualified health professional before starting any new therapy or rehabilitation method.

 

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published