Quick Overview
Twenty-eight elite soccer players. Three groups. Seven weeks.
The result? Only the whole body EMS group improved — recording a 15.1% leg press strength increase (p=0.009) and 8.5% leg curl increase (p=0.026). Muscle biopsies confirmed 8.9% growth in Type II muscle fibres (p=0.023) — the exact fibres behind muscle tone and definition. The group that trained identically without EMS? Absolutely zero significant gains.
Published in Frontiers in Physiology by German Sport University Cologne — the EMS difference simply could not be any clearer.
We always provide direct links to the original research at the end of every article so you can review the evidence yourself.
Scientists Discovered Something Remarkable When Elite Athletes Added Whole Body EMS to Their Training

Seven weeks. Twice a week. And the results only happened in one group.
There is a question that sits at the heart of every serious fitness goal: can you build more muscle and get stronger without simply training longer and harder?
For elite soccer players, already among the fittest people in the world, that question is particularly loaded. These are athletes training up to four sessions a week, playing competitive matches every weekend, already pushing their bodies to the limit. The idea that anything could produce measurable results on top of what they already do seems almost unreasonable.
And yet, that is exactly what a team of researchers from some of Germany's most distinguished scientific institutions went and found out.
The Scientists, the Institutions, and Why This Matters

This research did not emerge from a student experiment. It was conducted by a team of sports scientists from the German Sport University Cologne — Germany's most prestigious sports science institution, internationally recognised as a world leader in exercise and performance research — alongside colleagues from Ruhr-University Bochum and the University of Hildesheim.
The study was funded by the Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft — Germany's own Federal Institute of Sport Science, the government body responsible for funding elite performance research across the nation.
Their findings were published in Frontiers in Physiology — a leading international peer-reviewed journal in exercise science, with editorial oversight from scientists across the globe.
Germany, of course, has a scientific tradition that needs little introduction. The country that gave the world some of its most transformative advances in chemistry, physics, and medicine applies the same rigour to its sports and exercise science. When German sports scientists publish in a peer-reviewed journal, the international community takes notice.
What They Actually Did

Twenty-eight trained male soccer players — competitive athletes, not beginners — were divided into three groups.
The first group added Whole Body EMS to their regular training schedule. Wearing a Full Body EMS System, they performed squat jumps while electrical impulses activated muscles simultaneously across their entire body — twice a week for seven weeks.
The second group performed the exact same squat jumps, the same sets and repetitions, on the same days — but without Whole Body EMS.
The third group continued their regular soccer training as normal, with no additions whatsoever.

Before and after the seven weeks, researchers ran every participant through identical strength tests — and, crucially, took muscle biopsies. Real tissue samples, examined under laboratory conditions using immunohistochemistry and western blotting. This is not guesswork. This is cellular-level evidence of what actually happened inside the muscles.
The Results That Couldn't Be Explained Any Other Way
Here is where the study becomes genuinely compelling, because the numbers do not just tell a story — they tell it three times over.

The Whole Body EMS group showed a 15.1% increase in leg press strength (p=0.009) and an 8.5% increase in leg curl strength (p=0.026). Both results carried large effect sizes — not marginal, not borderline, but clearly meaningful improvements in measurably stronger muscles.

The jump training group — who did the exact same exercises, at the same intensity, for the same duration — showed no significant strength improvements at all.
The control group, who continued their regular training, also showed no significant changes.
The conclusion is difficult to argue with. The only variable separating the groups was the Whole Body EMS. The jumps alone were not enough. The soccer training alone was not enough. The Whole Body EMS was the difference.
What Happened Inside the Muscle
This is the detail that elevates the study from interesting to genuinely important for anyone focused on muscle gain and toning.

The muscle biopsies revealed that the Whole Body EMS group experienced 8.9% growth in Type II muscle fibres (p=0.023) — the fast-twitch fibres most responsible for power, strength, and visible muscle definition. This was a statistically significant result with a large effect size.
The jump group? No significant fibre growth. The control group? No significant fibre growth.
Type II muscle fibres are the ones most associated with the lean, defined physique people work toward — the fibres that respond to intensity, contribute to visible muscle tone, and are typically the hardest to fully engage through conventional training alone.
The Whole Body EMS group showed measurable growth in these fibres. The other groups did not.
The Detail That Changes Everything
There is one element of this study that deserves its own moment.

Each Whole Body EMS session lasted just 8.5 minutes. The effective stimulation time per session was 2 minutes.
These were already elite athletes — people whose bodies had long since adapted to demanding physical training. And across just 14 training sessions over seven weeks, totalling under ten minutes each, their muscles grew and their strength increased in ways that the same exercise without Whole Body EMS simply could not replicate.
The Bottom Line
This study — conducted by leading German sports scientists and funded by Germany's Federal Institute of Sport Science — demonstrates that Whole Body EMS can produce meaningful changes in muscle strength and muscle fibre growth in already-trained individuals. Changes that identical training without Whole Body EMS failed to produce.

For anyone working toward stronger, more defined muscles — whether pushing past a plateau or looking to get more from every session — the research points in one clear direction.
This article summarises findings from Filipovic et al. (2019), "Superimposed Whole-Body Electrostimulation Augments Strength Adaptations and Type II Myofiber Growth in Soccer Players During a Competitive Season," published in Frontiers in Physiology. Whole Body EMS devices are fitness and wellness accessories. Individual results vary.
Featured Product
ORIEMS FIT ULTIMATE KIT 💪 is a 100% Australian award-winning product.
Voted YEAR’S BEST ⭐ for 2024 and 2025.
It is a wide-range targeted muscle stimulator enhanced with EMS technology, designed to support your fitness and relaxation routine. 🌟
Trusted by more than 10,000 happy users with over 450 five-star Google reviews. 😊
Check availability.
Product Disclaimer:
This product is designed only to support fitness and relaxation routines. It is not a medical device and has not been evaluated or registered by the TGA. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease or medical condition. It may not be suitable for everyone. Please consult your doctor or healthcare practitioner before using it.
Like this Research Digest? 📚
Share it with your friends 💬👇https://bit.ly/43QuN8G
More EMS Research Scientists Are Studying
1. Can EMS reduce fat?
2. Can EMS increase calorie burn while sitting?
3. Can EMS support muscle toning and muscle gains?
4. Can EMS improve athletic training?
5. Can EMS play a role in muscle loss & frailty?
6. Can EMS reduce pain?
7. EMS vs TENS: What are the differences?
Research Summary
| Study title | Superimposed Whole-Body Electrostimulation Augments Strength Adaptations and Type II Myofiber Growth in Soccer Players During a Competitive Season |
| Authors | Andre Filipovic, Markus DeMarees, Marijke Grau, Anna Hollinger, Benedikt Seeger, Thorsten Schiffer, Wilhelm Bloch & Sebastian Gehlert |
| Research institutions | German Sport University Cologne, Ruhr-University Bochum & University of Hildesheim, Germany |
| Journal | Frontiers in Physiology |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA |
| Year published | 2019 |
| Study type | Randomised controlled trial |
| Total participants | 28 trained male soccer players across 3 groups |
| Participant profile | Already-trained competitive athletes training 2–4 sessions per week with at least 3 years competition experience |
| Intervention duration | 7 weeks, 2 sessions per week (14 sessions total) |
| Session duration | 8.5 minutes per session; 2 minutes effective stimulation time |
| Leg press strength finding | Researchers found a 15.1% increase in the Whole Body EMS group (p=0.009, large effect size). No significant change in training or control groups. |
| Leg curl strength finding | Researchers found an 8.5% increase in the Whole Body EMS group (p=0.026). No significant change in training or control groups. |
| Type II muscle fibre growth | Muscle biopsies confirmed 8.9% growth in Type II muscle fibres in the Whole Body EMS group (p=0.023, large effect size). No significant growth in other groups. |
| Link to original study | doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01187 |
Disclaimer
This article is published for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, health advice, diagnosis, or treatment of any kind.
All content on this website, including any studies, research, or information mentioned, is provided for informational purposes only and does not imply or guarantee any specific health outcomes.
We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected in any way to any researchers, universities, research centres, journals, or institutions referenced in any article. No reference to any study, researcher, or publication should be interpreted as an endorsement or recommendation of any products sold or featured on this website.
Our products (and any products featured or linked in this article) are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, prevent, or manage any disease or medical condition. Individual results may vary significantly. No guarantees or warranties are made regarding effectiveness, safety, or specific outcomes.
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before using any product mentioned on this website or making any changes to your health routine, especially if you have a pre-existing medical condition, are pregnant, breastfeeding, have a pacemaker, or are taking medication.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, ORIEMS FIT, its directors, employees, authors, affiliates, and agents disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, cost, expense, or injury (whether direct, indirect, consequential, special, or incidental) arising from the use of, or reliance upon, any information in this article or from the purchase or use of any products featured or sold on this website.
© [ORIEMS FIT] – All Rights Reserved.


