Quick Overview
Scientists at Teikyo Heisei University tested home EMS in 19 older adults aged 61–78.
They scanned the quadriceps with ultrasonography, measured knee strength, and took fasting blood. After one 30-minute session, free fatty acids rose from 523.3 to 606.9 µEq/L and glucose rose from 96.4 to 98.8 mg/dL. After 12 weeks, intramuscular fat, thickness, and strength did not clearly change.
The paper in the European Journal of Applied Physiology, from Springer Nature, still treats that short-term blood shift as a measured response in ageing muscle, and notes EMS is also studied in other groups.
Read the full post for the protocol, numbers, and limits.
We always provide direct links to the original research at the end of every article so you can review the evidence yourself.
What Scientists Measured When Older Adults Used Home EMS for 12 Weeks
A research team in Japan asked a simple question.
Could gentle EMS, or electromyostimulation, change muscle and blood markers in older adults?
They did not write an advert.
They ran a study.
Then they published it.
The paper appeared in the European Journal of Applied Physiology.
That journal is issued by Springer Nature, through Springer-Verlag in Germany.
Germany has a long record in careful laboratory science.
The work was led by Maya Hioki and colleagues at Teikyo Heisei University.
Partners included Kyushu Sangyo University and Uruido Minami Medical Clinic.
An ethics committee approved the plan.
The trial was registered as UMIN000043041.
A Japanese research grant helped fund it.
That is why this summary can point back to a real paper.
Named scientists.
Named universities.
A named journal.
A named publisher.
What the study set out to do
Age can shrink muscle.
It can also raise intramuscular fat, which is fat stored inside muscle.
The team wanted to know two things.
First, what happens in the blood after one EMS session?
Second, what happens after 12 weeks of training?
They focused on the quadriceps, the big muscles at the front of the thigh.
They used ultrasonography to estimate fat inside muscle.
They also measured muscle thickness and strength.
They took fasting blood samples.
The people in the study were 19 older adults.
There were 10 men and 9 women.
Their average age was 71.5 years.
Ages ran from 61 to 78.
They were not obese.
Average BMI was 22.9.
They lived independently.
They already walked a fair amount.
Average steps were about 7,531 a day.
This was not a sports-team trial.
It was a study of everyday older adults.
How the EMS sessions worked
Each person used an EMS device at home.
Training ran for 12 weeks.
They trained 3 times a week.
Each session lasted 30 minutes.
Pads sat on the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis.
The machine used 30-Hz pulses.
Each pulse lasted 300 microseconds.
Muscle worked for about 7 seconds, then rested about 7 seconds.
The setting was mild on purpose.
Staff wanted a visible contraction.
They did not want pain.
The force from EMS was only about 5 to 7 percent of a person’s strongest kick.
That matters.
This was gentle home use.
It was not a max-effort gym blast.
What one session did to the blood
Here is the clearest change the study measured.
After a single EMS session, free fatty acids in the blood rose.
Before the 12-week program, the average went from 523.3 to 606.9 µEq/L.
After the program, it still rose, from 503.5 to 554.8 µEq/L.
Glucose also rose after a session.
Before training, it went from 96.4 to 98.8 mg/dL.
After training, it went from 95.6 to 99.6 mg/dL.
The researchers treated those rises as an acute metabolic response.
In plain words, the body appeared to move fuel into the blood after the session.
The paper says a single session enhanced lipid and glycolytic metabolism in that short window.
Insulin, triglycerides, interleukin-6, and HOMA-IR did not show a clear acute shift.
So the “progress” this study actually recorded was immediate, not dramatic long-term change.
What 12 weeks did, and did not, change
After 12 weeks, resting blood tests looked much the same.
Fasting glucose went from 96.4 to 95.6 mg/dL.
Free fatty acids went from 523.3 to 503.5 µEq/L.
Those shifts were not statistically significant.
Echo intensity, the ultrasound stand-in for intramuscular fat, did not fall in a meaningful way.
Muscle thickness stayed similar.
Knee-extension strength stayed similar, 133.0 Nm before and 134.1 Nm after.
That is the honest scoreboard.
The gentle home plan did not melt thigh fat on the scanner.
It also did not build a lot of extra size or strength in this group.
The authors say the dose may have been too light.
Other EMS studies they cite used harder contractions.
Some used longer daily sessions.
This team kept the setting comfortable so people could keep going at home.
Who this paper is really about
The evidence in this paper is about older adults.
The clearest measured response was the rise in free fatty acids and glucose after one session.
The authors still see a practical angle.
Some older people find running, walking, or weights hard.
The paper says EMS may be an extra option when usual exercise is difficult.
The introduction also notes that EMS has been studied in other groups.
Those include athletes, and people in clinics with limited movement.
Those points come from earlier research, not from this 19-person trial.
This study does not prove the same blood changes in every group.
How to read the bright side without overclaiming
The bright side is not a miracle fat-loss story.
The bright side is narrower, and still useful.
Older adults could use EMS at home for 12 weeks.
A session produced a measurable rise in circulating free fatty acids.
Glucose also moved after the session.
The protocol was mild, visible, and meant to stay tolerable.
That is what the numbers show.
Not a cure.
Not a promise.
A published measurement of an acute response, plus a clear record of what did not change.
If you see EMS discussed online, ask for the paper.
Ask for the journal.
Ask for the sample size.
This one had 19 people.
It lasted 12 weeks.
It used a low contraction level.
That caution is part of taking the science seriously.
The short takeaway
Japanese university scientists tested home EMS in older adults.
Springer Nature published the work in a German-based physiology journal.
One session was followed by higher free fatty acids and glucose.
Twelve weeks of gentle training did not clearly cut intramuscular fat or raise strength.
The study’s purpose was to test those effects in ageing muscle.
Its safest message is simple.
EMS can create a short-term metabolic ripple.
Bigger body-composition claims need stronger proof than this paper gives.
Featured Product
ORIEMS FIT ULTIMATE KIT 💪 is a 100% Australian award-winning product.
Voted YEAR’S BEST ⭐ for 2024 and 2025.
It is a wide-range targeted muscle stimulator enhanced with EMS technology, designed to support your fitness and relaxation routine. 🌟
Trusted by more than 10,000 happy users with over 450 five-star Google reviews. 😊
Check availability.
Product Disclaimer:
This product is designed only to support fitness and relaxation routines. It is not a medical device and has not been evaluated or registered by the TGA. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease or medical condition. It may not be suitable for everyone. Please consult your doctor or healthcare practitioner before using it.
Like this Research Digest? 📚Share it with your friends 💬👇 https://bit.ly/4ygsvxe |
About Our Health Research Digest
We bring you the latest and most important health research papers — simplified and easy to understand.
Each study is broken down into clear, concise summaries and engaging podcasts, with direct links to the original research so you can explore further whenever you like.
We also create content based on your requests. If you’re curious about a specific health topic or would like us to find relevant studies, simplify the findings, and turn them into a podcast, just let us know.
Don’t hesitate to reach out — we’re here to help make health research accessible and useful for you. Contact us anytime.
More EMS Research Scientists Are Studying
1. Can EMS reduce fat?
2. Can EMS increase calorie burn while sitting?
3. Can EMS support muscle toning and muscle gains?
4. Can EMS improve athletic training?
5. Can EMS play a role in muscle loss & frailty?
6. Can EMS reduce pain?
7. EMS vs TENS: What are the differences?
8. Can EMS play a role after stroke?
Research Summary
| Topic | What the paper reports |
|---|---|
| Full title | Effect of electromyostimulation training on intramuscular fat accumulation determined by ultrasonography in older adults |
| Lead authors | Maya Hioki, Hiroko Takahashi, Akira Saito, Mizuka Imai, and Hideki Yasuda |
| Journal and date | European Journal of Applied Physiology (2023) 123:271–282; published online 19 October 2022 |
| Publisher | Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature |
| Original study link | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05074-3 |
| Trial registration | University hospital Medical Information Network, UMIN000043041 |
| Research centres | Teikyo Heisei University, Kyushu Sangyo University, and Uruido Minami Medical Clinic, Japan |
| Study purpose | Test acute blood changes after one EMS session, and 12-week changes in intramuscular fat, muscle size, strength, and fasting blood markers in older adults |
| Who took part | 19 independently living, non-obese older adults (10 men, 9 women); 20 started and 1 stopped |
| Age and body size | Mean age 71.5 ± 5.4 years (range 61–78); mean BMI 22.9 ± 2.8 kg/m²; mean weight 59.3 ± 10.5 kg |
| Training plan | Home EMS of the quadriceps for 12 weeks, 3 sessions a week, 30 minutes each session |
| Device and settings | ESPURGE stimulator; 30 Hz, 300 µs pulses; about 7.1 s on / 7.0 s off; pads on vastus lateralis and vastus medialis |
| How hard the contraction was | Intensity set for a visible, comfortable twitch; EMS force was 5.2% ± 4.1% of MVC before training and 6.9% ± 4.0% after |
| What scientists measured | Ultrasound echo intensity (fat index) in vastus lateralis and rectus femoris; muscle and skin thickness; isometric knee-extension strength; fasting glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, triglycerides, interleukin-6, and HOMA-IR |
| Acute blood evidence | After one session, free fatty acids rose from 523.3 ± 187.0 to 606.9 ± 185.2 µEq/L; glucose rose from 96.4 ± 11.7 to 98.8 ± 13.1 mg/dL |
| 12-week muscle and fat evidence | No significant change in echo intensity, vastus lateralis thickness (2.0 ± 0.3 cm), or combined anterior muscle thickness (2.3 ± 0.5 cm) |
| Strength evidence | Maximal isometric knee extension was 133.0 ± 43.4 Nm before and 134.1 ± 42.7 Nm after 12 weeks (not significant) |
| Resting blood after 12 weeks | Fasting glucose 96.4 vs 95.6 mg/dL; free fatty acids 523.3 vs 503.5 µEq/L; no clear change in insulin, triglycerides, interleukin-6, or HOMA-IR |
| Daily activity context | Mean 7,530.8 ± 3,583.6 steps a day; total activity about 81.1 minutes and 3.76 MET h |
| Authors’ conclusion | One EMS session raised free fatty acids and glucose; 12 weeks of this gentle protocol did not improve intramuscular fat, muscle thickness, strength, or resting blood markers |
| Funding and ethics | JSPS KAKENHI Early-Career Scientists grant #18K17764; approved by the Ethics Committee of Teikyo Heisei University |
| Platform | Listen Now |
|---|---|
 Apple Podcasts |
Listen on Apple |
 Spotify |
Listen on Spotify |
 YouTube |
Watch on YouTube |
 Amazon Audible |
Listen on Audible |
 Podbean |
Listen on Podbean |
Related Posts
-
2015 Study Published in Diabetes & Metabolism Journal
-
2022 Study Published in European Journal of Applied Physiology
-
2012 Study Published in the peer-reviewed BMJ Open journal.
-
2019 Study published in the European Journal of Applied Physiology.
-
University of Rome Study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Disclaimer
This article is published for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, health advice, diagnosis, or treatment of any kind.
All content on this website, including any studies, research, or information mentioned, is provided for informational purposes only and does not imply or guarantee any specific health outcomes.
We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected in any way to any researchers, universities, research centres, journals, or institutions referenced in any article. No reference to any study, researcher, or publication should be interpreted as an endorsement or recommendation of any products sold or featured on this website.
Our products (and any products featured or linked in this article) are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, prevent, or manage any disease or medical condition. Individual results may vary significantly. No guarantees or warranties are made regarding effectiveness, safety, or specific outcomes.
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before using any product mentioned on this website or making any changes to your health routine, especially if you have a pre-existing medical condition, are pregnant, breastfeeding, have a pacemaker, or are taking medication.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, ORIEMS FIT, its directors, employees, authors, affiliates, and agents disclaim all liability for any loss, damage, cost, expense, or injury (whether direct, indirect, consequential, special, or incidental) arising from the use of, or reliance upon, any information in this article or from the purchase or use of any products featured or sold on this website.
© [ORIEMS FIT] – All Rights Reserved.
