Skip to content

Pain-Free Fit Lifestyle | Explore More

Get in touch with us

Can EMS Recruit Muscle Fibers My Normal Training Might Miss? | Neural Adaptation Study (University of Groningen & Zurich)

Can EMS Recruit Muscle Fibers My Normal Training Might Miss?  |  Neural Adaptation Study (University of Groningen & Zurich)

Quick Overview

Researchers found EMS increased force production 20–40% in weeks, with strong neural activation seen in brain imaging. Even the untrained limb gained up to 60% of strength improvement (cross-education effect). EMS stimulates motor units in a different recruitment pattern than voluntary contraction. For trained individuals, this may mean accessing fibers not fully engaged during conventional lifting.

Introduction: Why ORIEMS FIT Research Digest Exists

At ORIEMS FIT Research Digest, we simplify real scientific research from universities and peer-reviewed journals into everyday language.

No hype.
No exaggerated claims.
No promises of cure.

Our goal is to help you make informed decisions about electrical muscle stimulation (EMS).

This article is educational only and does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Links to original studies will be always provided at the end of each article


What Is This Study About?

Many people ask:

If I already train hard, can EMS activate muscle fibers that my normal workouts might not fully recruit?

This peer-reviewed research explored how electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improves strength — and more importantly, how it does it.

Instead of focusing on muscle growth, the researchers examined neural adaptations — changes in how your brain and nervous system activate muscle.


Who Conducted the Research?

  • Authors: Tibor Hortobágyi & Nicola A. Maffiuletti

  • Institutions: University of Groningen (Netherlands) & Schulthess Clinic (Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Journal: European Journal of Applied Physiology

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2012-2

This was a peer-reviewed mini-review, meaning the authors analyzed multiple controlled studies on EMS strength training.


What Type of Electrical Stimulation Was Studied?

The research focused on:

EMS (Electrical Muscle Stimulation)

Also called Electrical Stimulation Training (EST).

This is different from:

  • TENS – mainly used for sensory nerve stimulation related to discomfort perception

  • FES – used to restore functional movement in neurological rehabilitation

This study specifically examined muscle-strengthening EMS protocols, typically using:

  • 30–75 Hz stimulation frequencies

  • Repeated contraction cycles

  • Multi-week training programs


Who Was Studied?

Across the reviewed studies:

  • Healthy adult men and women

  • Trained and untrained participants

  • Lower limb and upper limb muscles

The research did not focus on disease treatment.
It examined strength adaptation in healthy muscle.


How Did They Study It?

Because this was a review paper, it examined multiple experimental designs, including:

  • Randomized controlled trials

  • Unilateral vs bilateral training

  • EMS vs voluntary strength training comparisons

Common study features included:

  • Duration: 3–6 weeks (short-term phase)

  • Measurement: Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC)

  • Neural drive testing (EMG, H-reflex, V-wave)

  • Muscle fibre analysis

  • Brain imaging (fMRI) in some studies

Importantly, many studies showed:

  • Strength increased early

  • Muscle size did not significantly increase during the first weeks


What Did They Find?

1️⃣ Strength Increased Before Muscle Size Changed

Several studies showed measurable increases in maximal strength within weeks.

However:

  • No significant muscle hypertrophy was observed in early phases.

  • Muscle fiber size often remained unchanged initially.

This suggests something else was responsible.


2️⃣ The Nervous System Adapted

The researchers concluded that early strength gains were:

Associated with neural adaptations.

These included:

  • Increased neural drive to muscle

  • Improved motor unit activation

  • Changes in cortical (brain) activation

  • Enhanced communication between brain and muscle


3️⃣ EMS May Activate Muscle Differently Than Voluntary Training

The paper explains that EMS activates muscle through:

  • Direct stimulation of motor axons under electrodes

  • Strong sensory feedback sent back to the brain

This differs from voluntary contraction, where:

  • The brain initiates movement internally

  • Motor units are recruited in an orderly fashion

Because EMS activates nerves externally and non-selectively, it may stimulate motor units in patterns that differ from voluntary exercise.

That is where the idea comes from that EMS may recruit muscle fibers that normal training does not always fully activate.

However, the paper carefully avoids claiming that EMS replaces exercise.
Instead, it suggests EMS can provide a different neural stimulus.


What Does This Mean If You’re Considering EMS?

Mechanism

EMS works by:

  1. Electrically activating motor nerves

  2. Producing muscle contractions

  3. Sending strong sensory feedback to the brain

  4. Modifying neural drive over time

Realistic Expectations

  • Early strength improvements are likely neural

  • Visible muscle growth may take longer

  • EMS is a supplement to training, not a substitute

Safety

Most reviewed studies involved healthy adults and used controlled parameters.
However, individuals with medical conditions should consult a healthcare professional before use.


What Does This Mean If You’re Already Using EMS?

If you noticed:

  • Improved strength without visible muscle growth

  • Better muscle activation

  • Improved contraction “connection”

That aligns with what this research describes.

Consistency matters.
Proper electrode placement matters.
Intensity should be tolerable but progressive.


EMS vs TENS – Clear Difference

Feature EMS TENS
Main target Muscle contraction Sensory nerves
Strength adaptation studied Yes No
Motor cortex involvement Observed Not primary focus
Purpose Muscle activation support Sensory modulation

This study relates specifically to EMS for strength training.


Conclusion

This University of Groningen and Zurich review suggests:

Early strength gains from EMS are primarily driven by neural adaptations, not immediate muscle growth.

EMS appears to:

  • Increase neural drive

  • Influence motor cortex activity

  • Potentially activate motor units differently than voluntary training

It does not claim to cure, treat, or replace training.

It explains how strength changes may occur.

For informed decisions, reviewing peer-reviewed evidence matters.


🔵  SUMMARY TABLE

Category Details
Full Study Title Neural adaptations to electrical stimulation strength training
Authors Tibor Hortobágyi, Nicola A. Maffiuletti
Year 2011
Journal European Journal of Applied Physiology
Publisher Springer
Country of Journal Germany
Country of Research Netherlands & Switzerland
University University of Groningen; Schulthess Klinik Zurich
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2012-2
Direct Link https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-011-2012-2
Study Type Peer-reviewed mini-review
Participants Multiple studies analyzed
Population Healthy adults
Electrical Stimulation Type EMS / EST
Frequency Range Commonly 30–75 Hz
Duration 3–6 weeks typical early phase
Control Groups Voluntary strength training or contralateral limb
Primary Outcome Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)
Secondary Outcomes EMG activity, reflex responses, cortical activation
Muscle Hypertrophy Not observed in early phase
Neural Adaptation Observed and emphasized
Statistical Significance Reported in multiple reviewed studies
Funding Academic institutions
Conflicts None declared
Limitations Review design; variable protocols
Conclusion

Early strength increases associated with neural adaptations

 

🔴 DISCLAIMER

This content is provided for educational purposes only.

It does not constitute medical advice.
It does not diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

ORIEMS FIT does not make therapeutic claims.

Individual results may vary.
The research discussed may not apply to all individuals.

Readers should consult a qualified healthcare professional before using electrical stimulation devices, especially if they have medical conditions or implanted devices.

ORIEMS FIT is not affiliated with the University of Groningen, Schulthess Klinik, or Springer.

No endorsement of medical outcomes is expressed or implied.

ORIEMS FIT accepts no liability for misuse of products or misinterpretation of blog content.

This article complies with Australian TGA advertising standards.

All health decisions remain the responsibility of the reader.

ORIEMS FIT Research Digest makes complex research from top scientists and universities easy for anyone to understand—clear, simple, and never medical advice, just trustworthy science.

Interested in a certain topic? Let us know! We'll help you find solid studies and turn them into easy-to-read summaries, always linking to the original source so you can explore further or verify it yourself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

🛒 Featured Product

Original Oriems Ultimate Kit

Enhance your fitness and relaxation routine with EMS technology trusted by over 10,000 Aussies.
Proudly chosen from 68,000+ nominees.

🏆 Voted Year’s Best two years in a row (2024 & 2025).
Click above to check availability.

Disclaimer: This product is designed for general wellness and fitness purposes only. It is not a medical device and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

 

🔍 How We Source Research Studies

At ORIEMS FIT Research Digest, every study we feature comes directly from peer-reviewed scientific journals, not social media or secondary websites.
Here’s how the process works:

  1. Global Database Access
    We search through respected scientific databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, MDPI, Frontiers, and Google Scholar — including university-hosted repositories.

  2. Peer-Reviewed Journals Only
    Each paper we select must come from recognized academic journals indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed, ensuring the research has passed expert review.

  3. Verification and Citation
    Every article is read in full — not just the abstract — and we verify:

    • the authors’ institutions (universities, hospitals, or research institutes),

    • the publication year,

    • and the journal’s credibility.
      We always include journal names, volume numbers, and DOI or reference links at the end of every digest.

  4. Simplified, Not Altered
    We rewrite the findings in simple, clear language — especially for readers aged 14 to 80 — but the data, results, and scientific integrity remain untouched.

  5. Continuous Updates
    Our library grows weekly with new papers from Australia, Europe, Asia, and North America, highlighting only verified studies on EMS, FES, and natural healing mechanisms.


🧠 Our Mission

To make cutting-edge science understandable for everyone — without losing the facts or exaggerating the claims.

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published