Quick Overview:
A 12-week French study in elite rugby players tested EMS alongside normal training. After 6 weeks, squat strength increased 8.3%. After 12 weeks, squat strength improved 15%. Knee extensor torque rose 18% (eccentric 120°/s) and up to 19% (concentric 120°/s). Squat jump height increased 10%, and drop jump improved 6.6%. The control group showed no meaningful change. Results suggest structured EMS may support measurable strength and power gains when combined with regular training.
ORIEMS FIT Research Digest
At , we translate real university research into simple, clear language.
Our goal is to help you understand how EMS (electrical muscle stimulation) works — whether you are considering buying a device or already using one.
This article is for education only. It is not medical advice. It does not diagnose or treat any condition. Links to original studies will always be provided at the end of every article.
What Is This Study About?
This research examined whether 12 weeks of EMS training could improve muscle strength and power in elite rugby players.
Who conducted the study?
Researchers included Nicolas Babault and colleagues from French sport science institutions and the French Rugby Federation.
Where was it conducted?
France.
What type of stimulation was used?
The study used EMS (electromyostimulation).
It did not use TENS.
Quick EMS vs TENS explanation:
-
EMS causes muscles to contract.
-
TENS is typically used to influence pain signals.
This study focused on strength and performance, so EMS was used.
Who participated?
-
25 elite male rugby players
-
Competing in 1st or 2nd division French rugby
-
Average age: about 22 years
-
15 players used EMS
-
10 players were the control group
These were healthy athletes, not people with injuries or chronic pain.
How Did They Study It?
Study Design
-
Players were randomly divided into EMS and control groups.
-
Both groups continued regular rugby training (5 sessions per week).
-
Only the EMS group added EMS sessions.
-
Testing occurred at Week 0, Week 6, and Week 12.
EMS Protocol Details
-
Frequency: 100 Hz
-
Pulse width: 400 microseconds
-
5 seconds contraction, 15 seconds rest
-
36 contractions per muscle group per session
-
12 minutes per muscle group
-
Warm-up stimulation: 5 Hz for 5 minutes
-
Weeks 1–6: 3 sessions per week
-
Weeks 7–12: 1 session per week
Muscles stimulated:
-
Quadriceps (front thigh)
-
Calf muscles
-
Glute muscles
Intensity was adjusted based on tolerance but strong enough to create meaningful contractions.
No serious discomfort was reported.
What Did They Measure?
Researchers tested:
Strength
-
Isokinetic knee extension torque
-
Full squat 1RM
-
Scrum machine pushing force
Power
-
Squat jump
-
Countermovement jump
-
Drop jump
-
Repeated jump test
Speed
-
20-meter sprint
-
50-meter sprint
What Did They Find?
After 6 Weeks
The EMS group showed:
-
Squat strength increased by about 8%
Other measures did not change significantly at this stage.
After 12 Weeks
The EMS group showed improvements in:
Knee Extensor Strength
-
Eccentric torque increased around 18% at one test speed
-
Concentric torque improved around 10–19% at certain speeds
Squat Strength
-
Increased by about 15%
Jump Performance
-
Squat jump improved about 10%
-
Drop jump improved about 6%
What Did NOT Improve?
-
Sprint speed did not improve.
-
Scrummaging force did not significantly change.
-
Some jump tests showed no clear change.
The control group showed no major improvements.
What Does This Mean If You Are Considering EMS?
1. EMS Can Support Strength Adaptation
In this study, adding EMS to regular training was associated with improvements in certain strength and power measurements.
2. It Does Not Improve Everything
Speed and some rugby-specific skills did not improve.
EMS may support muscle strength, but it does not automatically improve sport performance skills.
3. Consistency Matters
Stronger improvements appeared after 12 weeks, not just 6 weeks.
4. Safety
No serious discomfort was reported in these athletes.
However, this does not mean EMS is suitable for everyone.
If you have:
-
A medical condition
-
A pacemaker or implanted device
-
Neurological issues
-
Pregnancy
You should consult a health professional before use.
What Does This Mean If You Already Use EMS?
Be Consistent
Results in this study took time.
Use Proper Intensity
Strong but tolerable muscle contractions were used.
Understand Expectations
EMS may support muscle activation and strength over time.
It is not a shortcut or replacement for all training methods.
Conclusion
This 12-week study in elite rugby players found that EMS training, when added to regular rugby practice, was associated with improvements in measured strength and some power outcomes.
It did not improve sprint speed or scrummaging performance.
EMS may be useful as a training support tool, particularly for muscle activation and strength development.
If you want full context, read the original study linked below.
🔵 Detailed Research Summary Table
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Study Title | Effects of electromyostimulation training on muscle strength and power of elite rugby players |
| Authors | Nicolas Babault, Gilles Cometti, Michel Bernardin, Michel Pousson, Jean-Claude Chatard |
| Year Published | 2007 |
| Journal | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
| Publisher | National Strength & Conditioning Association |
| Country of Journal | United States |
| Country of Research | France |
| University / Research Centre | French sport science institutions and French Rugby Federation |
| Study Type | Controlled randomized training study |
| Participants | 25 elite rugby players |
| Age | Mean age ~22 years |
| Gender | Male |
| Health Condition | Healthy elite athletes |
| Type of Stimulation | EMS (electromyostimulation) |
| Muscles Stimulated | Quadriceps, calves, glutes |
| Frequency | 100 Hz |
| Pulse Width | 400 microseconds |
| Contraction Pattern | 5 sec on / 15 sec off |
| Sessions | 3/week (Weeks 1–6), 1/week (Weeks 7–12) |
| Intervention Duration | 12 weeks |
| Control Group | Regular rugby training only |
| Primary Outcomes | Knee torque, squat 1RM |
| Secondary Outcomes | Jump tests, sprint tests, scrum force |
| Statistical Significance | Reported at p < 0.05 for key strength improvements |
| Funding Source | Not clearly stated |
| Conflict of Interest | Not clearly stated |
| Key Limitations | Small sample size, elite athletes only, not general population |
| Research Conclusion | EMS training was associated with improvements in certain strength and jump performance outcomes in elite rugby players |
Original Study Link:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17530954/
🔴 Disclaimer
This article is provided for educational purposes only.
It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
ORIEMS FIT does not claim to cure, prevent, or treat any disease.
Results observed in research studies do not guarantee individual outcomes.
Individual responses to EMS may vary.
You should consult a qualified health professional before using electrical stimulation if you have any medical condition, are pregnant, have an implanted device, or are unsure whether EMS is appropriate for you.
This content is not intended to replace professional medical care.
ORIEMS FIT is not affiliated with the research institutions mentioned.
Readers are responsible for their own health decisions.
No liability is accepted for misuse of products or misinterpretation of this content.
This article complies with Australian regulatory expectations and avoids therapeutic claims.
ORIEMS FIT Research Digest makes complex research from top scientists and universities easy for anyone to understand—clear, simple, and never medical advice, just trustworthy science.
Interested in a certain topic? Let us know! We'll help you find solid studies and turn them into easy-to-read summaries, always linking to the original source so you can explore further or verify it yourself.
🏆 Voted Year’s Best two years in a row (2024 & 2025).
Click above to check availability.
🔍 How We Source Research Studies
At ORIEMS FIT Research Digest, every study we feature comes directly from peer-reviewed scientific journals, not social media or secondary websites.
Here’s how the process works:
-
Global Database Access
We search through respected scientific databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis, MDPI, Frontiers, and Google Scholar — including university-hosted repositories. -
Peer-Reviewed Journals Only
Each paper we select must come from recognized academic journals indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed, ensuring the research has passed expert review. -
Verification and Citation
Every article is read in full — not just the abstract — and we verify:-
the authors’ institutions (universities, hospitals, or research institutes),
-
the publication year,
-
and the journal’s credibility.
We always include journal names, volume numbers, and DOI or reference links at the end of every digest.
-
-
Simplified, Not Altered
We rewrite the findings in simple, clear language — especially for readers aged 14 to 80 — but the data, results, and scientific integrity remain untouched. -
Continuous Updates
Our library grows weekly with new papers from Australia, Europe, Asia, and North America, highlighting only verified studies on EMS, FES, and natural healing mechanisms.
🧠 Our Mission
To make cutting-edge science understandable for everyone — without losing the facts or exaggerating the claims.













































